In January 2026, the governor of Poland’s central bank made a statement that stopped me mid-scroll.
Adam Glapiński — head of the National Bank of Poland, a NATO country, a European Union member — announced publicly that he intended to increase Poland’s gold reserves to 700 tonnes.
His reason? Two words: “national security.”
Not inflation hedging. Not portfolio diversification. National security.
Poland was already the world’s largest gold buyer in 2024. Then it bought even more in 2025 — 102 tonnes, bringing its total to 550 tonnes. Gold now makes up 28% of the country’s reserves, up from a 20% target just months earlier.
And Poland isn’t alone.
China added gold for 14 consecutive months. Kazakhstan posted its highest annual gold purchases ever recorded. Brazil’s central bank re-entered the gold market after a four-year absence. Turkey kept stacking. The Czech Republic is buying on a set schedule toward a 100-tonne target by 2028.
The World Gold Council surveyed central bankers in 2025. The results:
95% expect global gold reserves to increase over the next 12 months — the highest level ever recorded.
43% plan to increase their own holdings — up from 29% the year before.
Zero plan to decrease.
Meanwhile, gold just crossed $5,100 an ounce. It set 53 all-time highs in 2025 alone. Total global demand surpassed 5,000 tonnes for the first time in history.
Something big is happening. The people who manage trillions of dollars in sovereign wealth are all making the same bet. And most retail investors have no idea why.
This started with a single weekend in 2022
On February 26, 2022, two days after Russia invaded Ukraine, the US and EU froze $300 billion in Russian central bank reserves.
It was the financial equivalent of a nuclear strike. The largest sanctions action against a sovereign nation in modern history.
And it worked — at least as a punishment. Russia’s ruble collapsed. Its banking system was cut off from SWIFT. Its economy went into shock.
But there was a second-order effect that almost nobody in Western markets paid attention to.
Every central banker in the developing world — from Beijing to Riyadh to New Delhi — watched $300 billion in sovereign reserves disappear with a keystroke and asked themselves a very simple question:
Could this happen to us?
Not because they supported Russia. But because they held the same type of assets, in the same Western financial system, under the same rules that could be rewritten overnight.
The answer they arrived at — quietly, consistently, over the three years since — has reshaped global capital flows in ways the market still hasn’t fully priced.
The numbers tell the story
Before the Russia freeze, central banks bought 400–500 tonnes of gold per year on average. That was the norm for a decade.
After the freeze:
2022: 1,136 tonnes. More than double the average.
2023: Over 1,000 tonnes. Again.
2024: 1,045 tonnes. Third consecutive year above 1,000.
2025: 863 tonnes. Slightly lower — but at prices above $4,000 an ounce, meaning central banks spent more moneyon gold than ever before.
Total value of global gold demand in 2025: $555 billion. Up 45% year over year.
And here’s the part that breaks traditional economic models: central banks kept buying even as the price surged. That’s the opposite of how commodity markets are supposed to work. Higher prices should reduce demand. But sovereign buyers aren’t trading gold — they’re accumulating a strategic asset. Price elasticity doesn’t apply when your motivation is sovereignty.
Meanwhile, the flip side of this trade is just as telling.
China’s US Treasury holdings dropped to $682.6 billion in late 2025 — the lowest since 2008. That’s a 49% decline from the $1.3 trillion peak in 2013.
China reduced its Treasury holdings by $173 billion in 2022, another $50 billion in 2023, another $57 billion in 2024, and the pace accelerated in 2025.
The dollar’s share of global foreign exchange reserves fell to 56.9% in Q3 2025 — the lowest level since 1994, according to the IMF. Down from 71% in 2001.
This is not a crash. But it’s a trend that has been running in one direction for 25 years, and it just accelerated.
Why this isn’t “just a gold story”
Here’s where most analysis stops. Gold up, dollar down, buy some bullion, end of article.
That’s not what’s happening.
What’s actually being built — right now, in real time — is the plumbing for a parallel financial system.
China’s Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS) now connects 4,800 banks across 185 countries. It processes yuan-based transactions entirely outside SWIFT.
Russia and China settle 99% of their bilateral trade in rubles and yuan. No dollars.
At the 2025 BRICS Summit in Rio, member states formally agreed to develop a cross-border payment system built on interoperable central bank digital currencies. The BRICS bloc now represents 45% of the world’s population and 39% of global GDP.
Will any of this replace the dollar tomorrow? No.
But the direction is unmistakable: the world’s largest economies are building optionality. They want the ability to trade, settle, and store value outside the dollar system — not because they’ve stopped using dollars, but because they’ve seen what happens when someone does.
And optionality, once it exists, gets used.
The Russia proof of concept
Russia itself became the unintentional case study.
When the West froze its $300 billion in reserves, the expectation was economic collapse. And the short-term shock was real. But Russia had one asset class that couldn’t be frozen: gold stored in domestic vaults.
The Bank of Russia holds about 75 million ounces. The physical quantity hasn’t changed much since 2022. But the value has more than doubled — from $141 billion in February 2022 to over $326 billion by the start of 2026.
That gold appreciation — roughly $185 billion — offset more than half of the frozen reserves.
Every central banker in the world can see that math. And every one of them is drawing the same conclusion: the asset you physically hold in your own vault is the asset that actually belongs to you.
That’s not a gold bug argument. It’s a risk management calculation. And it’s being made by the most conservative financial institutions on earth.
Where the opportunity actually is
Now, the investment question.
Most people hear “de-dollarization” and think: buy gold. That’s not wrong. But it’s surface-level.
Gold at $5,100 has already priced in a significant amount of this trend. The people who made 3-4x on this trade bought before it was obvious. The central banks buying today are doing so for 20-year strategic reasons, not for short-term returns.
The real opportunity — the part that reminds me of where defense stocks were two years ago — is in the companies, infrastructure, and asset classes that benefit from this structural shift but haven’t been repriced yet.
Think about it this way: if central banks are going to buy 800-1,000 tonnes of gold every year for the next decade, who mines it? Who refines it? Who stores and transports it? Who builds the alternative payment rails? Who benefits from the shift in trade settlement patterns?
Some of these companies are quietly posting record revenues. Some are trading at valuations that reflect zero awareness of the macro tailwind behind them. And one in particular occupies a position in the gold supply chain that I think is genuinely mispriced — the kind of structural advantage that takes years to build and can’t be easily replicated.
Below, I’ll walk you through everything.
In this week’s premium section:
My complete de-dollarization portfolio — 7 positions across gold infrastructure, alternative financial systems, and one overlooked asset class that’s quietly becoming the structural winner of this trend
Why I’m not just buying gold miners — the “picks and shovels” layer that offers better risk-adjusted returns than the metal itself
The “chokepoint” company — a single business sitting on a critical bottleneck in the physical gold supply chain, with sovereign clients, pricing power, and a valuation that hasn’t caught up with reality
How to front-run central bank demand — these buying patterns are publicly announced, geographically concentrated, and shockingly predictable once you know where to look
The three risk scenarios — what would break this thesis, including the one geopolitical development that could either accelerate or reverse the entire trend overnight
Every week, I spend 30+ hours digging through earnings calls, government filings, and supply chain data so you don’t have to.
Two new deep-dive editions per week. Full investment theses with entry points, weightings, and exit scenarios. No fluff, no filler — just the kind of analysis that actually moves the needle on your portfolio.
I’ve been told Macro Notes Premium is probably the most interesting financial newsletter you won’t get tired of reading.
Subscribe today to lock in the $100/year rate before it’s gone.